<span id=printer_friendly>Printer-friendly version</span>Printer-friendly versionSend to friendSend to friend

Do not be carried away by all kinds of strange teachings. It is good for our hearts to be strengthened by grace, not by eating ceremonial foods, which is of no benefit to those who do so. We have an altar from which those who minister at the tabernacle have no right to eat. The high priest carries the blood of animals into the Most Holy Place as a sin offering, but the bodies are burned outside the camp. And so Jesus also suffered outside the city gate to make the people holy through his own blood. Let us, then, go to him outside the camp, bearing the disgrace he bore. For here we do not have an enduring city, but we are looking for the city that is to come. ~He 13:9-14



In the Old Testament, food was divided into two groups, those considered as clean and those considered as unclean. Abiding by these dietary laws could perhaps reap certain health benefits, but in terms of spiritual benefits there are none. Yet when the Old Testament Israelites kept these dietary laws, they grew spiritually. Their spiritual growth was made evident through their obedience to God’s Law and it was not because of the food they ate which made them any cleaner or unclean. In the time of the New Testament, the Lord had declared all food to be clean (Mk 7:19). The Old Testament dietary laws were meant as an object lesson to teach us to steer away from sins and immoral things, for these are what truly destroy our spiritual life. Instead, we should pursue after things that are pure and the doing of good works, where by these things, we are built up unto godliness.

Therefore, the author of Hebrews said “it is good for our hearts to be strengthened by grace, not by eating ceremonial foods” where there are no benefits. The grace which Hebrew Christians had depended upon to be saved was it not the sacrifice on the altar – representing the Lord Jesus Christ – which they had no right to eat from? What then does this have to do with eating and drinking? Absolutely nothing at all! For their justification had been made complete through the blood of the Lord Jesus Christ, and not from deciding whether to eat or abstain from certain foods. The author had used the example from one of the Old Testament sacrificial rites to explain this ceremonial food which should not be eaten. The ritual was performed as such: a priest would have a bull slaughtered at the entrance to the tent of meeting and some of the bull’s blood would be used to sanctify the altar, the fat would be burnt on the altar, as for the body, it would be burnt outside the camp (Ex 29:10-14). This sacrifice was represented by the Lord Jesus Christ, where He too had to leave the city of Jerusalem and allow His body to be hung on the cross at Golgotha. By His death and blood, the sins of God’s people were cleansed away. Therefore, the author encouraged the Hebrew Christians to follow after the Lord’s example. If they truly desired to pursue after holiness, they ought to follow after Him and go to Him outside the camp, bearing the disgrace He bore. The keeping of dietary laws could never lead them to holiness.

What does it actually mean for Jesus to bear disgrace outside the camp? “Inside the camp,” meant acceptance, recognition and acknowledgment, while to be “outside the camp,” it meant rejection, disregard and disapproval. The holy city of Jerusalem was the place where the temple of God resided. Within the temple were the priests, high priest and the religious leaders – where they are given the highest honour and authority among the Israelites and representatives of the entire Israel. The holy city being the religious centre of the people was a meeting place for all Jews from all nations on every God’s appointed festival. Jesus Christ the Son of God was the fulfilment of the Old Testament prophecy of the coming Messiah, who shall deliver the people of Israel from bondage. Naturally, Jerusalem would be the first to recognise Jesus’ deity given that the religious leaders there were considered to be most familiar with the Law. Regrettably, they not only failed to acknowledge Him, they even employed despicable methods to put Him to death. By the Lord’s crucifixion outside the city of Jerusalem, it signified His rejection by the kingdom of Israel as their Lord and King. The Lord forsaken by His people and having suffered death on the cross alone became the very example that the author wanted the Hebrew Christians to follow.